|
AGA NLC Begins
with GAO’s Dodaro

Gene L.
Dodaro, CGFM |
AGA’s Sixth Annual National
Leadership Conference kicked off Thursday morning with a
record-breaking attendance of more than 700 and an address by
Gene L. Dodaro, CGFM, chief operating officer, U.S. Government
Accountability Office (GAO). Dodaro began his remarks by
acknowledging the enormous contributions of Comptroller General of
the United States David M. Walker, CPA, who announced last week that
he will leave the post in March after nearly 10 years in office to
head a private sector foundation.
Dodaro, who will serve as acting
comptroller general until a new CG is named, pledged to continue
GAO’s commitment to its mission as well as shining the light on the
nation’s looming fiscal crisis—a hallmark issue of Walker’s tenure.
“Dave has done a terrific job on a wide range of issues,” Dodaro
said of Walker, “and we’ll continue to deal with those issues.”

Gwendolyn
Sykes, MPA, CGFM |
Dodaro said he titled his
presentation “Creating Momentum in a Time of Transition” before he
knew his own agency would undergo a transition. He pointed to the
upcoming presidential election and the change in administration as
an opportunity and a challenge for the federal government.
With just one transition in power
since 1992, Dodaro acknowledged the significance of the first
transition of power in a post-9/11 world and said the government
needs to be ready to accept 3,000 new presidential appointees while
maintaining the financial management progress that’s been made over
the last decade.

Zack E. Gaddy, CGFM |
In fiscal year 2007, he said, 19 of
24 CFO Act agencies received clean audit opinions, up from just six
agencies in 1997. “But clean opinions,” he said, “isn’t the end
game.” Issuing timely, relevant information useful to
decision-makers continues to be a goal of the financial management
community. “The accountability community needs to keep up the
momentum going forward.”
The federal government still has a
disclaimer opinion on its consolidated financial statements, but
Dodaro noted the huge accomplishment of issuing an unqualified
opinion on the 2007 Consolidated Statements of Social Insurance as
well as the recently issued eight-page citizen’s guide to
government.
According to Dodaro, major
impediments to a clean governmentwide opinion include:
» Serious financial management issues at the Department of Defense.
» Inability to reconcile intra-agency activity.
» Ineffective process for preparing the consolidated financial
statement.
» Systems management issues.
Areas where progress is being made
include:
»
Estimates if improper payments. In 1997, he noted, there were no
estimates. “It’s hard to explain to the American taxpayer that tens
of millions of their dollars are being spent on payments that didn’t
need to be made,” he said.
» Single audit issues regarding grants.

Diana Jones Ritter |
The federal government’s long-term
fiscal imbalance is an area where Walker and GAO have devoted a lot
of effort. “We’ve got a long-term fiscal imbalance fueled largely by
health care costs and changing demographics,” Dodaro said, adding
the decisions going forward will be tough, but we need to make sure
we’re not wasting money, and we need the systems in place to make
decisions and deliver services to the American people. “It’s a huge
challenge for all of us. It’s a huge challenge for our country.”
He referred to the survey results
issued by AGA yesterday, which reinforce the need for good
governance, transparency and accountability. Big decisions are
looming, he said, “and the accountability community will be under
the spotlight in the next few decades like never before. So we need
to be ready.”
Dodaro explained the 1964
Presidential Transition Act, which provides federal funding to
ensure the orderly transition of power from one administration to
the next. With $8.5 million in the 2009 budget allocated to the
transition, Dodaro said that with federal funding comes a
responsibility for transparency. GAO is preparing for the transition
and will make itself available to any member of the new
administration who wishes to learn more about the particular
management challenges facing agencies and the government as a whole.
Also on GAO’s current agenda:
»
Continuing to identify major risks to government as well as the 21st
century challenges and opportunities.
» Pressing forward on key management reforms.
» Sustaining attention on the nation’s long-term fiscal imbalance.
“GAO remains committed to keeping fiscal challenges at the forefront
of the policy-makers’ view,” he said.
He discussed GAO’s successful
High-Risk Program, which he said has been an impetus for
governmentwide reform because it promotes sustained attention by
Congress to key problems.
“Believe me,” he said, “if a
program gets on the list, they want to get off as fast as they can.
And it’s a lot easier to get on the list than to get off.”
To get off the
list, an agency or program needs the commitment of top leadership as
well as a good plan and proof of concrete progress. “A plan is not
enough,” he said. “It has to be executed.”
NLC Speakers
Discuss the Challenges of Various Generations Working Together,
Insights into the 2008 Presidential Election
Jeffery H.
Davis, M.Ed., a
leadership development consultant, talked about the various
generational challenges facing today’s work force. As Baby Boomers
retire, they’re not mentoring the people they’re leaving behind, he
said, which causes a brain drain, particularly in government.
He defined the
generations by the following age breakdowns:
» Silent Generation/Greatest
Generation—ages 62–83
» Baby Boom—ages 43–61
» Gen X—ages 30–42
» Gen Y—ages 21–29 (Gen Next)
The silent
generation is retiring, and quickly. Boomers comprise 45 percent of
workplace and are decreasing slowly. Gen X makes up 30 percent of
the work force and is increasing slowly as they come back to work
after raising families or getting advanced degrees. Gen Y makes up
15 percent and is increasing fast.
Three or four
different generations are working together today, sometimes
successfully, other times not, said Davis, a keynoter Thursday
afternoon at AGA’s Sixth Annual National Leadership Conference (NLC)
in Washington, D.C. Each generation is operating under assumptions
about the other and give each other labels such as geezer, young
buck, etc.
“Your
opportunity is to foster a synergistic environment where you get the
best from everyone,” he said. “You’re going to need all the
generations at work in order to be effective.”

Jay Carney |
Later, Jay
Carney,
Washington bureau chief for TIME magazine, told the NLC attendees
about spending three years in Moscow writing about the fall of the
Soviet Union. He said he felt depressed to land back in Washington
because he feared his most exciting days as a reporter were behind
him.
During his
first week covering Bill Clinton’s presidency, deputy White House
counsel Vince Foster was found dead of a suicide although the cause
of death is still debated, he said. This set in motion a tone for an
administration that was “almost a circus” to cover, he said. Since
then, Carney was on Air Force One on Sept. 11, covered the
devastation of Hurricane Katrina and is now watching the most
compelling presidential election in his lifetime. “It’s clearer now
more than ever that I was wrong when I came from Moscow to a
shocking series of events I’ve felt fortunate to cover,” Carney
said.
As the media
watches the slow winding down of the Bush administration, Carney
noted the interesting fact that there was no heir apparent in either
party, which is why the election season started so early. He noted
Republican Sen. John McCain’s remarkable political turnaround.
McCain began as the front-runner candidate despite most of his party
not liking or supporting him, and by last summer his campaign was
written off as dead.
“TIME and
others wrote that it was highly unlikely that he could resurrect his
campaign,” Carney said, noting TIME recently called him “the
phoenix” in a cover story.
Carney first
wrote about McCain in 1997 and has covered him closely since. He
said McCain has lived “one hell of a life,” militarily and
personally. If he wins, he’ll be the oldest person to ever be
elected to the White House, but Carney said he appreciates McCain’s
ability to be himself in an era of tightly handled politicians.
He noted the
story in Thursday morning’s New York Times about a
potentially damaging relationship McCain once had with a lobbyist.
Carney questioned the timing of the article and said the way it was
written was like “taking pumpernickel and white bread and trying to
make pound cake from it.” The article neither proved a romantic
relationship with the lobbyist nor did it supply evidence of
influence bartering. While acknowledging the story could prove
highly destructive to McCain’s campaign, Carney said it could also
fade away just as quickly.
“Some people
close to him are more likely to accept that he had an affair than
sold political favors to a lobbyist,” said Carney, noting McCain’s
notorious intolerance for lobbyists. Carney joked that should the
lobbyist story explode into scandal, “You can see Mitt Romney
saying, ‘I only suspended my campaign.’ ”
This
presidential campaign, Carney said, is about replacing a president
whose approval rating has dipped to an all-time low—the lowest
sustained job approval ratings since Nixon. Conversely, Bush also
enjoyed the highest sustained approval ratings of any modern
president after Sept. 11.
“People are
just waiting impatiently for the Bush presidency to be over,” Carney
said, which is shocking considering Bush was a hero to his party not
that long ago.
Republican
issues are no longer resonating the way they used to—communism is
dead, the Cold War is over, tax rates are low, and teen pregnancies
and abortions have declined. “Conservatives within the Republican
party are struggling to find a new identity for themselves,” Carney
said.
He talked
about Democratic Sen. Barack Obama’s candidacy and compared him to
other “boutique” candidates of the past, such as Howard Dean. What
makes Obama different, Carney said, is his ability to appeal to blue
collar and “lunch bucket” Democrats by convincing them that he is
not all rhetoric.
“The
Democrats, if they don’t blow it—and God knows they can still blow
it—could be back in the cat bird’s seat with control of the White
House and Congress,” he concluded. —By: Marie S. Force
Admiral to NLC
Attendees: Bring Value to Your Organization and Your Country

Admiral Thad
W. Allen |
Admiral
Thad W. Allen, the 23rd commandant of the U.S
Coast Guard, spoke about leadership and vision on Friday, the final
day of AGA’s Sixth Annual National Leadership Conference in
Washington, D.C.
“Every day you
get up and go to work in government you have to be acting with
strategic intent in an organization, and your organization owes you
a strategic vision,” he said, adding that in the Coast Guard,
employees either support the mission or execute it.
“If you can’t
understand how you do either of those things, either we haven’t
properly explained the position or we don’t need it.”
Once a link is
made between what the agency is trying to do in the context of an
individual’s work, “You have to give less orders, people know what
they’re supposed to do. If everybody understands what you’re trying
to do they self-synchronize.” Make strategy meaningful to the people
in the work force and performance will follow, he said.
“In the Coast
Guard we try to lay out for everybody that we provide safety,
security and stewardship in the maritime environment,” Allen said.
“It’s a lot more complicated than that, but it is that simple.”
Every
organization must have three things: governance, a sense of what’s
going on and the operational capacity to do something about it. The
challenge for us moving forward, he said, is to tell those people
who work for you, with you, and those you work for what they’re
doing to bring value to the organization and the country.
Financial
management took a significant step forward with the passage of the
Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), but there’s only so
much we can do with GPRA or PART (Program Assessment Rating Tool)
without congressional reform, he said. “We probably need to accept
that we can’t reform Congress,” he said to laughter.
Allen tells
his people that there’s a lot more accountability in the world than
there used to be and that “we’re under the unflinching glare of
oversight, and there’s zero tolerance for failure in this town.”
He urged
attendees not to become too disillusioned. “The right thing is the
right thing,” Allen said. “Your job is more important than you
probably think it is. You provide the building blocks that lead to
the body of knowledge that allow us to do what we do.”
Allen also
answered the following questions:
What should
we be focused on as we prepare for the transition to a new
administration?
Allen: If your
organization hasn’t yet discussed the transition, go back and do it
now. No matter who is elected, there will be a new team in town. “We
are the continuity in this government. We are the folks who come in
every day and understand the mission and mission support.” Think
about how we’re going to orient these folks coming in.
What caused
the differences in results between FEMA and the Coast Guard in
Katrina?
Allen: The country
thought we were dealing with a hurricane. There was a failure to
understand it wasn’t a hurricane—it was like having a weapon of mass
effect deployed on the city of New Orleans without criminal
liability. Usually the federal government waits for the states to
ask for help. In the first week, were dealing with a “hurricane” the
way we always do. The city had lost command and control capability
and couldn’t employ the resources coming in. The federal government
couldn’t take control of the city because a mayor was still in
place. If a terrorist had attacked New Orleans, the federal
government would have taken control and there would have been no
doubt about the federal role. “We had no legal basis for federal
preemption in New Orleans, so there was no one representing the face
of the federal government for the first week. They still had a mayor
and governor. That’s where everything started to fall apart.” In
addition, there was a universal failure to understand the full
impact of what had happened. “This was no longer a hurricane and we
kept treating it like a hurricane.” Allen said he spent 72 hours
trying to figure out how to quantify it and then how to attack it.
What do you
tell young people about the Coast Guard?
Allen: The Coast Guard
is meeting all recruitment goals because the mission sells the
service. We need to do more to promote diversity and Allen said he
would like to see women advancing to higher levels. “Once you get
them in the door, it doesn’t take many hands in the water giving
someone their life back to get a recruit committed to what we do.”
The movie “The Guardian” helped us out a few years ago, he added.
It’s been
four years since the Coast Guard was made a part of the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security. How safe is the homeland and where
are the vulnerabilities?
Allen: The country is
safer than it was before DHS. We’re seeing more coherence as time
goes on. Katrina is held up as a failure. But there hasn’t been an
attack—doesn’t mean there won’t be, but there hasn’t been to date.
Our ability to team up with FEMA inside the department is better
than the way we used to do it before DHS. We have closed maritime
security gaps and done a good job on the big ships (300 gross tons
and above are regulated internationally). Allen said he is worried
that smaller boats, such as recreational and fishing boats, could be
used to bring weapons of mass destruction into the country. He has
had discussions with recreational boat owners and had one tell him
that driving is a privilege, but boating is a right. In dealing with
the small boat threat and the push back from recreational boaters,
Allen feels like he’s sticking his toe in the water and isn’t sure
whether he’ll be bitten by a piranha or a great white shark. “I’ll
let you know.”
|