If you are seeing this text, it is because you are using an obsolete browser which does not support current web standards. The site will still function, but some parts of it may look unusual. We recommend upgrading to a current browser version.
AGA logo
Advancing Government Accountability
About AGA
AGA Store
Certification
Conferences & Events
Continuing Education
Jobs
Join Now!
Membership & Chapters
Outreach
Press Room
Publications
Sponsors
Standards & Research
AGA Home

arrow 
GO

Print This Page



Performance and Accountability

Measuring Government Performance: Ankeny Officials Continue to Refine the Process

When it comes to producing an outstanding performance report, it’s hard to get it right the first time.

Performance reports are designed to tell the real story behind the dollars and cents. Sometimes, though, governments aren’t tracking the right things, or the information isn’t exactly what is needed to get a handle on how well government is serving its citizens.

And even though the City of Ankeny, Iowa, has earned national recognition from AGA for its performance reports three years in a row, Matt McQuillen, the Assistant to the City Manager who has put the last two reports together, is the first to say that performance reporting is an evolving field.

The city’s report, called a Service Efforts and Accomplishments (SEA) Report, outlines the city’s progress in public safety, transportation, utilities, parks and economic development. A consultant wrote the report the first two years, in fiscal years 2004 and 2005, with performance measures developed in part by a citizens’ committee that discussed what city services were most important to them. In 2006, the process became more integrated into the city organization, and department directors took a hard look at the data they were tracking. What they found was that in some cases, the outcomes were hard to quantify and didn’t really do justice to what the department was doing, McQuillen said. 

For example, the Planning and Building Department was tracking the number of building permits it approved—an important number in a city that saw a 33 percent population increase between 2000 and 2005. But officials determined that it would be more useful to determine not only the sheer number of permits, which the department had no control over, but how quickly they were approved.

City officials use the performance measures during the budget request process. Directors can use the data to determine trends and see how their departments’ performance compares with previous years. But McQuillen hopes that in the future, the public will become more involved in the process. A summary of the SEA report was mailed to all residents and businesses in the city’s quarterly newsletter, with directions to find more information on the city’s website. Eventually, McQuillen would like to see the entire report mailed to all households. “That’s a personal goal of mine.”

McQuillen said figuring out how to get citizens involved is tricky. Ankeny brought in citizens at the early stages of the process, but other governments do it later. Ankeny also contracts with the National Research Center to conduct biannual citizen satisfaction surveys. Every city service is covered and relates back to the performance measures.

The city used citizen feedback and the SEA information to change how it clears the streets in the winter. Salt is tough on roads, creating more potholes in the spring, but it melts ice efficiently. If more sand is used in the mixture, the snow removal costs go down because sand is cheaper; but in the spring, the street cleaning costs go up because sand makes a mess. After experimenting with using more sand, the city went back to using more salt in the mix. It turned out citizens cared more about clear streets in the winter and clean streets in the summer than hitting potholes in the spring.

McQuillen says the next SEA Report will evolve even further, by tying the performance measures more directly to the long-range goals set by the City Council—managing growth and infrastructure is one, for example. “It’s good to show the citizens what the vision is, and it also shows the governing body some tangible value.”

The ultimate goal of performance reporting is for governments to use the data analysis as a tool to make better decisions for citizens. Reports should show not only what services government performed, but what government is doing to make improvements. Here’s an example: Ankeny set a goal that Fire Department personnel will arrive on the scene within eight minutes, 80 percent of the time. That response time has been met more often (53 percent versus 25 percent the year before) now that the city has increased staffing from seven to 12.

“If you don’t have that second piece to it, if you’re not evaluating it, what’s the value of the information?” McQuillen said. “It’s just numbers on paper.” 

For governments that are new to performance reporting, McQuillen said a strong commitment from elected officials is important, as well as getting buy-in from department directors. “They’re the ones who have to track it and bring the data in. You really need their involvement early on for it to work long term. The top-down approach only goes so far.”


 


Association of Government Accountants   2208 Mount Vernon Avenue   Alexandria, VA 22301   PH 703.684.6931   TF 800.AGA.7211   FX 703.548.9367