AGA Today
Federal
Accounting Corner
Cost of Goods Sold
The two
different accounting models for the sales of assets are inventory sales
and asset disposal. Most private-sector companies use the first model
extensively, while most public-sector agencies use the second model
exclusively. Treasury's guidance in the transaction definitions mixes
the two together (entries C630-C634, C644-C646 and C648), so I wanted to
focus on them.
Budgetary Entries
When the
cash collected affects the budget, a budgetary source is debited (such
as 4266 Other Actual Business Collections from Non-Federal Sources) and
a status (for example, 4450 Unapportioned Authority) or an anticipation
account (for example, 4060 Anticipated Collections from Non-Federal
Sources) is credited. If a sale is made to another federal agency on
credit, a receivable budgetary source (such as 4287 Other Federal
Receivables) is debited instead. If a sale is made to the public on
credit, no budgetary accounts are posted. Since the budgetary entry is
the same for both disposals and sales of inventory, I am not going to
discuss them further.
Disposal Transactions
When assets
are sold in a transaction that is not part of an entity's line of
business, the gain or loss is explicitly recognized at the time of the
sale. On the proprietary side, cash is debited, the asset is credited,
any associated allowance account is closed out with a debit, and any
remaining amount goes to a gain or loss account.
Here is an example of the proprietary entries for equipment that had
been originally purchased for $900, incurred $750 in depreciation, and
was sold for $300:
Debit 1010 Fund Balance with
Treasury $300
1759 Accumulated Depreciation on Equipment
750
Credit 1750
Equipment
900
7110 Gains on Disposition of Assets -
Other 150
Here is an example of the proprietary entries for excess inventory that
was valued at $200 but sold for $75:
Debit 1010 Fund Balance with
Treasury $75
7210 Losses on Disposition of Assets -
Other 125
Credit 1524 Inventory - Excess, Obsolete, and Unserviceable
200
Inventory Transactions
When an
entity's business is to sell assets, and these are sold, the gain or
loss is implicit. The asset is moved to an expense account (cost of
goods sold), the revenue is recognized, and the profit or loss is
calculated along with other activity on the Income Statement (for the
federal government, the Statement of Net Costs). So, if inventory that
cost $265 is sold for $300, the entry would be:
Debit 1010 Fund Balance with Treasury $300
Credit 5100 Revenue From Goods Sold 300
Debit 6500 Cost of Goods Sold
$265
Credit 1521 Inventory Purchased for Resale 265
Entries C644, C646 and C648 show the gain and loss accounts being
posted, but has a note that entry E408 should also be used for cost of
goods sold. It would be more precise to say that only certain accounts
should use E408 and these should not use the gain or loss accounts.
Entry E408 lists three accounts that use the inventory model: 1521
Inventory Purchased for Resale, 1527 Inventory - Finished Goods, and
1561 Commodities Held Under Price Support and Stabilization Support
Programs. In addition, entry C630 shows account 1572 Stockpile Materials
Held for Sale converted to 6500 Cost of Goods Sold, but entries C632 and
C634 show no Cost of Goods Sold posting and instead post to 7110/7210
Gains/Losses on Disposition of Assets - Other.
Conclusion
The account
6500 Cost of Goods Sold is mutually exclusive with 7110 and 7210
Gains/Losses on Disposition of Assets. Only items held with the intent
to sell them should use the Cost of Goods Sold account. Other asset
disposals recognize a gain or loss at the time of the sale. I realize
that SFFAS 3 paragraph 55 states that, "The cost of stockpile materials
shall be removed from stockpile materials and reported as cost of goods
sold when sold. Any gain (or loss) upon disposal shall be recognized as
a gain (or loss) at that time." However, I believe the gain or loss is
recognized by reporting it on the Statement of Net Cost, not by posting
directly to a gain or loss account; otherwise, the asset couldn't be
moved to cost of goods sold because there would be no offsetting revenue
recognized. —Simcha Kuritzky, CGFM, CPA
This column is provided
as part of a free exchange of ideas in federal accounting, and is not
reviewed substantively before publication. Please send all comments,
queries, or corrections to Simcha.Kuritzky