AGA Today
Federal
Accounting Corner
Recording Continuing
Resolutions – An Update
A year ago I
wrote a column explaining that the SGL guidance for continuing
resolutions (transaction A104) said not to post cash and equity, but the
definition for 1010 Fund Balance with Treasury said that it should be
posted for a continuing resolution. In addition, a Treasury edit
requires that proprietary cash match budgetary cash, including
continuing resolutions, but there is another edit requiring proprietary
cash to match what is in Treasury's own system, which is not updated for
continuing resolutions. Treasury's SGL Board has now resolved this
problem.
Continuing
Resolutions
When Congress
does not pass the appropriations in time for the start of the new fiscal
year, they frequently pass a continuing resolution, which provides
agencies with limited authority to carry on current operations. Because
continuing resolutions are supposed to be a short-term, stopgap measure,
Treasury does not fund them with warrants, but rather waits for the
actual appropriation law to be passed. Treasury permits agencies to
disburse funds into a negative cash position when this is due to a
continuing resolution.
New Standard
General Ledger (SGL) Guidance
An agency's cash
is represented by account 1010 Fund Balance with Treasury. This year,
the SGL Board has added a new account, 1090 Balance with Treasury under
a Continuing Resolution. This account will support the budgetary
balances without causing a disagreement with Treasury's cash system. The
relevant SGL transactions are A128 and A196 through A199.
Say that Congress
passes a continuing resolution to fund the month of October at 90
percent of last year's levels. The agency had a fund with a $10 million
appropriation last year. The amount of the continuing resolution would
thus be $9 million annualized or .9 * 31 / 365 = 7.64383% in absolute
terms. The entries recorded would be:
Debit 4119 Other Appropriations
Realized 9,000,000
1090 Balance with Treasury under a Continuing Resolution
764,383
Credit 4450 Unapportioned
Authority 764,383
4395 Authority Unavailable for
Obligation
Pursuant to
Public Law – Temporary 8,235,617
3101 Unexpended Appropriations -
Appropriations Received 764,383
Depending on how one's accounting
system is set up, the easiest way to implement this could be to create
an entry for the annualized continuing resolution which debits 1090 and
4119, and credits 4450 and 3101 (in the above example, for $9 million).
Then a second entry reduces the annualized down to the current
appropriation level, with a debit to 4450 and 3101, and a credit to 4395
and 1090 (for $8,235,617). If the continuing resolution is extended, the
second entry is reduced. OMB's automatic apportionment would debit 4450
credit 4510 as usual. All disbursements would continue to use the 1010
account, which is allowed to go negative (though the net balance of 1010
and 1090 should not go negative). If the system tracks multiple funding
sources, then the continuing resolution could be entered as an
anticipated amount, to segregate it and also so that it will expire at
the end of the year if accidentally left in place.
Ending the Resolution
When an actual appropriation comes in,
1090 has to be replaced by 1010, the balance in 4395 moves to 4450, and
the annualized amount is likely to be different. The SGL guidance shows
the posting for the net difference. If the above continuing resolution
is replaced by an appropriation of $10.5 million, the net entry would
be:
Debit 4119 Other Appropriations
Realized 1,500,000
4395 Authority Unavailable for Obligation
Pursuant to Public Law –
Temporary 8,235,617
1010 Fund Balance with Treasury
10,500,000
Credit 4450 Unapportioned
Authority 9,735,617
1090 Balance
with Treasury under a Continuing Resolution 764,383
3101
Unexpended Appropriations - Appropriations Received 9,735,617
In some cases, it may be easiest to
back out the continuing resolution entries (both annualized and the
reduction to current) and enter a regular appropriation entry for the
full amount. The apportionment and lower-level budgets would then be
adjusted as normal. — by Simcha Kuritzky, CGFM CPA
This column is provided as part of a
free exchange of ideas in federal accounting, and is not reviewed
substantively before publication. Please send all comments, queries, or
corrections to
Simcha.Kuritzky@CGIFederal.com.