Highlights
AGA Seeks Director of Education for National
Office Click here
to find out more.
CPE
Opportunities Organized by Region
Find out More
About AGA's Upcoming PDC

Confirmed Speakers Include:
• Harvey Eckert, Deputy
Secretary for Comptroller Operations,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
• Douglas R. Carmichael, Chief
Auditor and Director of Professional
Standards, Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board
• John Hamre, President and
CEO, Center for Strategic and
International Studies
• Nell Minow, Editor, The
Corporate Library
• Gwendolyn
Sykes-Brown, Chief Financial Officer, National
Aeronautics and Space Administration
• Ross L. Tate, County
Auditor, Maricopa County, Arizona
• And many
more…
Hotel Reservation
Cut-Off:
June 4, 2004
For more information about the
conference agenda, registration,
hotel and travel discounts, please visit our website.
font>
Fall Journal to Cover International Issues
Submit your articles today to Journal Editor Marie Force
Review the Author Guidelines
by clicking here.
AGA Advertising
Opportunities! Advertise in AGA's electronic
newsletters—TOPICS and AGA Today! Get
maximum exposure and build your brand.
Click here for all the
information you need to run your ad! Or you can contact
AGA's Director of Communications,
Marie
Force
What Keeps a CFO Up
At Night?
Wednesday,
June 9, 2004
2 CPE Hours
An AGA/NASACT Training Audio Conference
Join Samuel T. Mok, CGFM, Chief Financial Officer of the U. S.
Department of Labor, for a discussion on “What Keeps a CFO
Up At Night?” You will also be given an opportunity to ask
questions and share experiences during the audio conference.
Click here to learn more.
AGA Annual National
Board of Director's (NBD) Meeting
Sunday
June 27, 2004
9 to 11 a.m.
Everyone is welcome—NBD members
especially encouraged to attend! The NBD consists of: NEC, RVPs,
RVPs-Elect, Immediate Past RVPs, Chapter Presidents, Past National
Presidents, Past National Treasurers. Click
here for further information.
|
|
June 1, 2004
• News from the Profession
Financial System Upgrades May be Key to More
Green Lights from OMB
Although no federal agency received a
"green light" in the latest assessment of progress on the
financial management portion of the President’s Management
Agenda, technology upgrades should help agencies achieve success.
While agencies made notable improvements in four of the five
categories on the U.S. Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) latest
traffic-light-style score card, released earlier this month, none moved
up a notch in financial management.
However, Linda Springer, who heads OMB’s effort to
improve financial management, said, "A number of agencies are
poised to receive a performance status upgrade for Improved Financial
Performance in the near term."
She also said in her report on the scorecard, "Equally
encouraging is that agencies aren't stopping their improvement efforts
once they achieve a green status rating. The Department of Education,
National Science Foundation, Social Security Administration and
Environmental Protection Agency are either committing to or expanding
efforts to distribute and integrate financial data into management
decision-making. And not only are these agencies finding meaningful
ways to distribute financial data to agency personnel, but
they’re also finding ways to better present and report this same
data to the taxpayer."
In addition to the four agencies with green lights, four
merited yellow and 18 received red lights. These marks reflect
accomplishments (or lack of) as of March 31, the close of the second
quarter of fiscal 2004.
Springer wrote that financial performance doesn’t improve
instantaneously. "That makes our achievements that much more
notable. I look forward to communicating additional progress as
agencies continue to implement new financial management systems,
receive unqualified audit opinions and eliminate improper payments in
the coming quarters."
To earn the highest rating in financial management, agencies
must produce accurate financial data on demand, make financial
information available to managers for use in daily decision-making,
meet annual deadlines for submitting audit paperwork and obtain
unqualified audit opinions. They also must demonstrate that they have
addressed weaknesses in internal controls and are in full compliance
with relevant laws and regulations, including the 1996 Federal
Financial Management Improvement Act.
If properly implemented, new financial management systems
should help agencies comply with FFMIA, The U.S. General Accounting
Office (GAO) has concluded.
—Amelia Gruber, Government Executive
Click here to
read more.
Click here to read Linda
Springer’s full report.
Federal Accounting
Corner by Simcha Kuritzky, CGFM, CPA
Appropriation Corrections in the
Journal and on the SF-224 (Part II)
Last month I covered transferring all the activity in Fund 6
(symbol 9940006) to Fund 6M (symbol 994/50006) due to a surprise change
in funding. This month, I will show the updates for a situation where
the agency retroactively adjusts all their journals to show the proper
symbol.
Click here to read the entire article.
Successful Financial
Managers See the Value of Failure
Individuals and organizations experience
failure on a continual basis. Most failures are small, a few large and
a certain few catastrophic. Financial managers are quick to perceive
the cost of failure, typically in the form of wasted money or lost
opportunity. But many financial managers "fail" to recognize
the significant value that is also present in nearly every failure. As
risk and uncertainty increase in our business environment, failures of
all kinds are bound to increase. But this is not the threat it seems to
be; we can learn a great deal from financial management techniques
practiced in industries that have always been immersed in risk and
uncertainty. In the complex, unpredictable world of business today,
whoever learns the most, the fastest wins. The fundamental value of
failure is that we can learn much more, much faster from failure than
from success. Of course, the challenge is making sure our failures
aren't so costly that they take us out of the game. —Bruce
Pounder, Leveraged Logic, as reported in SmartPros.com. Click here to read
more.
Sixty-Two Percent of
Full-Time Federal Employees
get Merit Bonuses
Almost two-thirds of the 1.6 million
civilian full-time federal employees received merit bonuses or special
time-off awards in fiscal 2002, according to a comprehensive
examination of federal records obtained by The Washington Post.
Of the 62 percent who got awards, half received $811 or more.
The typical bonus amounted to 1.6 percent of salary. The awards ranged
from less than $100 to more than $25,000. At some agencies, more than
90 percent of General Schedule workers collected a bonus.
Governmentwide, about 2,900 employees received cash bonuses totaling
more than $10,000 each.
The disclosure of the figures brought varying reactions. Some
civil service specialists said the proliferation of bonuses reinforces
a common belief that many federal workers are rewarded for little more
than showing up. Some agency and union officials said it was evidence
of a talented work force that performs admirably, and often at salary
levels inferior to those of the private sector.
Paul Light, a professor of government at New York University,
said he doubts the public will swallow the notion that merit was the
driving force behind the awards. "I don't think Americans think
that 60 percent of federal employees could possibly be so well above
average that they would earn a bonus," Light said in an interview.
"This is just going to further confirm what many Americans
believe, that the federal government is somehow an island unto
itself."
Colleen M. Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees
Union, said such views are unfounded. "There are an awful lot of
federal employees who do a very good job, whether it's on a project or
on a consistent annual basis," Kelley said. "And I'm glad to
see that managers are looking for some way to recognize and reward
them." —Christopher Lee and Hal Straus, The Washington
Post.
Click here to read
more.
California's Bond Rating Upgraded
For the first time in nearly four
years, California's worst-in-the-nation credit standing went up instead
of down as Moody's Investors Service upgraded the state's general
obligation bond rating to A3 from Baa1. Citing a recovering economy,
higher tax revenues and the likelihood that the Legislature and Gov.
Arnold Schwarzenegger will agree on a new budget, Moody's Investors
Service moved the state back from the brink of junk-bond status. The
move, if followed by other Wall Street rating companies, could save
taxpayers millions of dollars in interest on debt.
But don't uncork the champagne just yet: California's rating
remains lower than that of any other state. Fitch and S&P continue
to rank California as BBB. That and the fact that Moody's new rating is
only as high as the state's credit ranked last August reflects the
continuing fiscal challenge, particularly a sizable structural budget
deficit. Several prominent economists cautioned that the continuing
imbalance between state revenues and expenditures could discourage Wall
Street from lifting the rating much higher.
Moody's highest rating is Aaa—a status California last
enjoyed in 1989. Moody's has dropped the state's credit rating five
times since May 2001. —Jeffrey L. Rabin, Los Angeles
Times.
Click here
to read more.
OMB: Job Competitions
Predicted to Save $1.1B
In a report to Congress released
Tuesday, OMB provided its first estimates of savings to be generated by
competitive sourcing, a management initiative aimed at letting
contractors vie for thousands of federal jobs. Public-private
competitions completed at 26 major federal agencies in fiscal 2003 are
likely to yield $1.1 billion in net savings over the next three to five
years, OMB projected. "These are good returns for an initiative
that has faced statutory restrictions, cultural challenges and a large
learning curve, especially at civilian agencies that, until recently,
had relatively little experience with using competition as a management
tool," administration officials stated in the report. The OMB
statistics also indicate that in-house workers held onto nearly 89
percent of 17,595 jobs considered for outsourcing in contests finished
in fiscal 2003 and the first quarter of fiscal 2004. —Amelia
Gruber, Government Executive. Click here to
read more.
Public More
Frequently Turning to Internet to Contact
Governments
Americans' use of the Internet to access
government information is growing rapidly, according to a new study.
The report, "How Americans Get in Touch With Government,"
showed a 50 percent growth from 2002 to 2003 in the number of Americans
who visited a federal, state or local government website or contacted a
government official online. Still, people who reported they had
contacted government within the past year said they preferred telephone
or in-person visits to the Web or e-mail by a 53 percent to 37 percent
margin. The report was based on a survey of almost 3,000 Americans by
the Pew Internet and American Life Project, which is funded by the Pew
Charitable Trusts. —Elizabeth Newell, Government
Executive. Click here to
read more.
HHS Wants to Shift $55M
in Bioterror Funds from
States to Cities
The Bush administration is finalizing an
agreement with U.S. postal workers to help deliver antibiotics or
antidotes within 48 hours of a biological attack to 21 major cities.
U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy G. Thompson informed key
lawmakers May 20 that he intends to take $55 million from state
bioterrorism projects to pay for the new program, dubbed the
"Cities Readiness Initiative." In addition to paying for the
training of letter carriers, the money would be spent installing
sophisticated disease surveillance equipment, purchasing vaccines and
building new quarantine stations at U.S. airports, according to
documents prepared by Thompson's staff.
Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), chairman of the Senate Appropriations
subcommittee on labor, health and human services, praised the move,
saying that in a time of tight federal budgets it makes sense to shift
money to "high-risk cities" most likely to be targeted by
terrorists. But several governors, lawmakers and public health leaders
immediately protested what Shelley A. Hearne, head of the Trust for
America's Health, a nonpartisan public health advocacy group, called a
"shell game" with potentially dangerous consequences.
"We should not be in a situation of robbing Peter to pay
Paul," she said. Tapping letter carriers to deliver emergency
supplies is an "innovative idea with great possibilities,"
she said, but it should not be paid for with money promised to states.
—Ceci Connolly, The Washington Post.
Click here to read more.
House Panel Votes to Include
Program Reviews in GPRA
The decade-old Government Performance and
Results Act (GPRA) could be amended to include a requirement for
program reviews, under legislation recently approved by a House
Government Reform subcommittee. The Efficiency and Financial Management
Subcommittee approved the measure—sponsored by Subcommittee
Chairman Todd Platts of Pennsylvania—on a voice vote May 19. GPRA
"has laid a solid foundation for agencies working with Congress to
set strategic goals and being able to utilize performance-based
information," said Platts, who added that a recent GAO report
however indicated program evaluation is ar area in which federal
agencies "consistently come up short." Platt's bill would
amend GPRA with a provision requiring every program to be assessed at
least once every five years. "By requiring [OMB] to be responsible
for overseeing program assessment data, we will take a great step
forward in realizing the reform envisioned by GPRA and make the federal
government more efficient and results-oriented," Platts said.
Subcommittee Ranking Member Edolphus Towns of New York, however, said
he is "extremely skeptical that this legislation is going to have
any effect." Towns said attempts at performance-based budgeting
over the past 10 years have had only a minimal positive impact on
government performance. —Zach Patton, Congress Daily. Click here
to read more.
Officials Say Recruiting
Efforts will Offset Retirement Wave
Stepped-up recruiting efforts will
mitigate the effects of an anticipated wave of employee retirements,
federal officials say. As droves of civil service baby boomers near
retirement, the government has become increasingly concerned about
replacing the core of its work force, especially in the face of
competition from the private sector. The most pessimistic reports say
that as much as 70 percent of the federal work force will be eligible
to retire by 2010. U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Director
Kay Coles James and Reginald Wells, chief human capital officer for the
Social Security Administration, said at a House hearing that the
creation of agency human capital officer positions last year, and
efforts to step up recruitment programs with quicker hiring, more
benefits and better pay are helping address recruiting problems.
James described a target federal employee job applicant as
someone with outstanding academic achievement, leadership ability and
who has participated in service to the community. A commitment to
public service and "making a difference," James said, was
particularly important because it enabled the government to compete
with the allure of higher salaries and benefits from the private
sector. In addition, James emphasized that agencies should send only
people with hiring authority to job fairs: "Do not send hostesses
to hiring fairs—people to hand out key chains and
brochures," she said. James noted that applicants often wait in
line for hours and are there for jobs, not agency propaganda.
On-the-spot hiring would help the government combat the ability of
private companies to hire qualified applicants first, she said.
—Elizabeth Newell, Government Executive. Click here to
read more.
OMB Consolidates Grants
Guidance
OMB has brought together guidance that is
currently in seven separate Circulars and other OMB policy documents
and co-locates them in Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR). The OMB is establishing Title 2 in the CFR for grants and
other financial assistance and nonprocurement agreements. This provides
a good foundation for the streamlining and simplification of the policy
framework for grants and agreements required by the Federal Financial
Assistance Management Improvement Act of 1999 (Public Law 106-107). OMB Circulars continue
to be available on the OMB website.
|